Accéder au contenu principal

Blog migration

Now that I have a personal space on my institution's website, I decided to migrate this blog in order to have more control and independence. I also decided to unify all my research blogs. Here is the link to this new blog :

Possible Situations Blog

Therefore, this space will not be updated anymore, but I'll leave it as it is until Blogger reclaims it.

Commentaires

Enregistrer un commentaire

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

How to distinguish the semantic and metaphysical components of scientific realism? Is there a distinction at all?

Here are some short reflections that are only indirectly related to the main theme of this blog: about the traditional way of framing the thesis of scientific realism, that always confused me a bit. The components of scientific realism It is custom to distinguish the components of scientific realism very roughly as follows: Metaphysical thesis: there is a mind-independent structure of natural kinds Semantic thesis: scientific theories are "about" this mind-independent structure Epistemic thesis: we are in a position to know that they are true Although this three-fold distinction seems to make sense, it isn't so easy to classify various philosophical positions in this scheme, notably when it comes to pragmatist views, Kantian views or varieties of constructivism. Should they be interpreted metaphysically or semantically? Are they thesis about representation or about the nature of reality? I have always struggled a bit to respond (usually interpreting kant...
Enregistrer un commentaire
Lire la suite

Reflections (4): Scientific representation is piecemeal

Here are our conclusions so far: what the semantic conception of theories claims is that a theory provides us with a certain family of representational vehicles that are non-linguistic in nature, its models; however, the idea that representation in science is non-linguistic is unwarranted: for sure, the informal features of experimentation and the contextual nature of idealisations are hard to address using the correspondence rules put forth by logical empiricists, but this seems to point to a more pragmatic conception of linguistic interpretation, not to the idea that representation would be structural instead of linguistic. Having said that, I think that there is still a grain of truth in the semantic view, which is the following: Theories do not represent or describe nature directly as a whole. They are used to build models that represent it piecemeal. This, I take it, is an assumption that is shared by semantic and pragmatist conceptions of theories, and that is rather at odds...
Enregistrer un commentaire
Lire la suite

Review of "There Are No Such Things As Theories", by Steven French

In “There Are No Such Things As Theories”, Steven French defends that there are no such things as theories. This well-named book provides a careful review of a wide range of issues, ranging from the philosophy of science (the syntactic and semantic conceptions of scientific theories, fictionalism about scientific representation, theoretical equivalence, science in practice) to the philosophy of art, with a particular focus on the metaphysics of abstract objects, including fictions and works of art, and, of course, theories, so as to arrive at its provocative conclusion, which is roughly the following: scientific theories don’t really exist, but we can still make sense of ordinary discourse about scientific theories. I wasn’t convinced by this conclusion in the end, but I think that this is because I approach things very differently at the meta-philosophical level, and I am not particularly moved by metaphysical considerations in general (the ones signalled by the “really” emphasised...
Enregistrer un commentaire
Lire la suite